Skip to content

It’s like they think they can print their own money. Oh wait, they can. (6 ridiculous budget earmarks)

December 17, 2009

So the senate passed part of the spending bill that will be a portion of next year’s federal budget the other day.  This one amounted to $447 billion in spending for several Cabinet departments and other agencies for the 2010 budget year.  And of course, it included several low publicized bills for crazy stuff all over the country.  These little fill-ins are called earmarks, probably because calling them money-needed-by-elected-officials-to-repay-people-who-helped-them-get-elected would not be politically correct.  Critics call them pork.  Anyway, the pork (I guess I’m a critic) is slipped into budgets by various members of the senate and house.  I assume there must by a “you scratch my back and I’ll scratch yours” kind of thing going on, because there is no other reason for them to approve some of these ridiculous requests. 

Let's do lunch at the diner I funded

Some make sense, funding infrastructure and other areas of need.  Some, not so much.  This is especially apparent when the United States is setting new records in budget deficits.  For instance, in the 2008 budget there was an allotment of $50,000 by House appropriator Carolyn Kilpatrick (D-Mich.) for tree replacement in River Rouge.  According to the 2000 Census, River Rouge had a population of less than 10,000 people.   No offense to the residents there, but does that seem like something we need to be spending a bunch of money on right now?  

Unfortunately, nothing in the earmark requested shirts

That earmark, however, is quite tame and cheap compared to some others that have made it through the federal budget process.  Remember the “Big Dig” from yesterday’s post?  That started out as an earmark, and resulted in a $22 billion fiasco.  In fact, many earmarks are not even known to those voting for the budgets.  Back in 2007, the omnibus was 3,417 pages.  How many officials do you think actually read it through?  If you said more than zero, enjoy your vacation in the land of denial.  Here are others that are some of the worst offenders in recent years.  

You take it.  No, you take it. (2002 for Navy patrol boat) 

Three Washington state politicians got some language inserted into the 2002 budget that had the U.S. Navy buy a $4.5 million patrol boat from an Edmonds, WA shipbuilder.  The problem was the Navy didn’t want it.  They didn’t even know they were getting it until it was delivered to them.  Unable to find a use for it, they gave it to the University of Washington.  The school hasn’t been able to find a use for it either. 

$4.5M to a good home

The politicians that got the boat ordered each received about $15,000 in campaign contributions from the shipbuilder, and the shipbuilder had received over $17 million in earmarked contracts over the previous few years.  Interesting. 

“And here is, well…  nothing” (2008 for a walking tour) 

There’s a town in Virginia called Boydton.  It is one square mile in size and has about 500 residents.  In 2008, Rep. Virgil Goode (R-Va)  decided they need a walking tour of the “city”.  To implement this, he slipped $98,000 into the budget to create the tour to develop tourism in the area. 

Just another popular stop on the tour. I'm not sure why.

Well, I don’t know about you, but I just booked myself a night there.  I can’t wait to see a tavern built in 1790 and the Greek Revival Courthouse.  By the way, Rep. Goode was later quoted as saying  “federal budget spending is too much overall and Congress members should set an example by not spending too much.”  Oops. 

A monument to me (2008 for academic center) 

Charles Rangel (D-NY) decided his name wasn’t on enough buildings.  So he did what any other normal person would do: he put a $1.9 million earmark in the budget for an academic and public works center to be named after him.  

"Why? Because I can."

Rangel caught the attention of fellow politicians with this one.  He didn’t care, saying to other senators “I would have a problem if you did it, because I don’t think that you’ve been around long enough”.  In fact, he has been accused of  preserving a tax shelter for an oil drilling company whose chief executive pledged $1 million to the center.  This executive had previously made generous donations to Rangel’s campaign.  Again, interesting.  Well, that’s been put on the back burner for him now, as he is dealing with his failure to report over $75,000 in rental income he received from some properties he owns. 

 The infamous “Bridge to Nowhere” (2006) 

This is an earmark that garnered a lot of attention, as it should.  The bill called for the $398 million Gravina Island bridge to replace a ferry that would connect the mainland to the Alaskan island with a bursting town of…  50 people.  Yes, you read that right.  I understand the need for the Golden Gate and Brooklyn Bridges, but not this one.  In 2005, Congress received so much grief on this one that they removed it from legislation.  

Isn't nowhere everywhere in Alaska?

The story doesn’t end there.  After winning the governor’s race, Sarah Palin said she would pledge to responsible spending.  She then spent $25 million in government money to build the Gravina Island Highway that would connect to where the bridge would be.  Now mind you, this was after the bridge idea was scrapped.  So they built this highway that simply ends at the coastline.  

Actual picture of how the road ends. I'm serious. Look it up.

Why would they spend that much on a useless road you ask?  Because if they didn’t spend the money, they would have return the money to the federal government.  It’s a perfectly good excuse to fund a useless project, right?  I’m in the wrong industry. 

It just needs a new coat of pain (2007 for suburban renewal) 

Rep. Jerry Lewis obtained earmarks totalling over $2.5 million over several years to spruce up a Washington D.C. neighborhood.  Wait, why would I put this in here?  It seems like a nice thing to do.  The citizens would certainly appreciate it.  

You're right. This place looks awful.

Well, that’s the problem.  You see, Lewis is a resident.  So all this money has been spent making an already nice neighborhood nicer.  And what was that doing to his property value at the time?  Why, it was skyrocketing of course.  Hmmmm. 

Because every kid has one (2009 for wooden arrow companies) 

You know that kid on your street that has the bow and arrow set?  No?  Neither do I.  Well, the government apparently decided that more kids should be playing with dangerous things.  

He's only doing what his country wants him to do

Not only that, they slipped this one into the federal stimulus bill that passed not too long ago.  It calls for certain companies that make wooden arrows for children to receive tax breaks that will cost the government $2 million over the next 10 years.  Whatever. 

So remember folks, if you want something done, just donate to your local congress member.  I’m going to ask mine to put in an earmark for $50 so I have beer money this weekend.  No one will ever know.

For a full list of pork (and some kosher) earmarks by year, check out Citizens Against Government Waste.

9 Comments leave one →
  1. Mike Harmon permalink
    December 17, 2009 11:45 am

    I must say this is a great article i enjoyed reading it keep the good work 🙂

  2. December 18, 2009 1:23 pm

    ummmmm. you know a kid that grew up with a bow-and-arrow set…your’s truly! Not sure if you ever had the pleasure of participating in one of the Rolling Green insurections, but we routinely set out into the back hills with BB Guns, Chinese Throwing stars, and yes a Bow and Arrow. I actually took a 100 yard shot at Danny Trotter from the top of my folks yard toward that huge Edison tower that used to loom behind! Luckilly, I missed!!!

    • December 19, 2009 8:09 pm

      Yes, I had one too. I used to try to shoot arrows over the big power lines that went by my house and then catch them on the way down. Not the smartest thing, but it was damn fun.

      But you don’t see them anymore. I don’t know anyone who has gotten their kids a set. It’s like the BB gun. Who didn’t have one of those?

  3. Mark McHugh permalink
    December 22, 2009 10:47 am

    I loved this post! It hurts a little to say this, but I’m jealous of your writing skill.

    Great Great Stuff!

  4. April 20, 2013 10:54 am

    My husband and i ended up being

    so joyous Michael managed to complete

    his basic research from the ideas he had out of your
    blog. It is now and again perplexing just to find yourself handing out things which usually many people might have
    been trying to sell. We really fully understand we
    have the website owner to give thanks to because of that.

    All the explanations

    you made, the easy web site menu, the friendships you help

    to promote – it is many astounding, and it’s really

    making our son and the family reason why the theme is entertaining, which is certainly

    rather important. Thank you for all!

  5. April 23, 2013 1:48 am

    Good post however I was

    wanting to know if you could write a litte more on this subject?
    I’d be very thankful if you

    could elaborate a little bit further. Bless you!

  6. July 11, 2013 8:01 am

    Yesterday, while I was at work, my cousin stole my iPad and
    tested to

    see if it can survive a forty foot drop, just so she can be a youtube sensation.
    My iPad is now destroyed and she has 83 views.

    I know this is totally off topic but I

    had to share it with someone!


  1. Stimulate this! (A one year check-up on the federal stimulus plan) « A Whole Lot of Nothing
  2. A Whole Lot of Good Stuff (Tidbits from the first 100) « A Whole Lot of Nothing

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: